Ok i still don't understand what determines going from 64gb to 128gb RAM
The snowfield
> No pilluhan se on aina mielessä mutta hypätään nyt ensin!
well
@Daeng Do you know how `mining` or `mining difficulty` works? I'm happy to explain.
@Clueless like bitcoin every 2500 blocks right?
Ok ill learn that first
@Daeng So, imagine you roll a single die, 1-6. You win if you get `<=3`. That means you will win `1/2 of the time` you roll the die.
You can make it harder to win by raising the `difficulty` to `<=2`, now you will only win `1/3rd of the time`
if you raise the difficulty again `<=1` you will only win `1/6th of the time`
Ok understand but from 64gb to 128gb increase is determined by blocks? I read only 6%+ mined
no, by average difficulty
Meaning there's a possibility to go from ilama to capybara again? (Maybe not possible)
no
it only goes up
@Daeng we shouldn't jump ahead. that causes confusion.
So, mining is basically a function `rolling dice` with a dynamic `difficulty` Here's the thing, if the difficulty suddenly gets too high, that means technology has likely progressed to the point that mining is too easy?
So, the idea here is to make it harder/slower to deal with, by doubling the size of the snowfield.
It also gives me an outlet for my rage
Ok but still don't understand who determines the snowfield? Fireduck?
the difficulty of the block
But why doesn't it goes back to 64gb if the block difficulty decrease? Like no longer profitable to mine @ price too low
@Daeng the difficulty is the result of some math regarding the last number of blocks, in bitcoin it's 2016?
For example when the difficulty goes to 41 then we will go to field 8
@Daeng and, because, you don't want a miner to jump in with a TON of hash power, mine a bunch real quick, then pull out and wait for it to drop. (like has happened in bitcoin)
And if difficulty goes to 21 field to 4 no right?
Btw like the project Apache license no more snowblossom classic/cash
I don't think Apache prevents that
I designed it for the snowfield never go back down because if it did it would probably Boomerang back and forth between two once we actually hit a memory capacity wall.
@Daeng https://www.blockchain.com/charts/hash-rate it takes a bit more resolution than that, but i fyou compare bitcoin to bitcoin cash, you can see there were bitcoin miners jumping back and forth in order to adjust the difficulty and mine more, abusively The estimated number of tera hashes per second (trillions of hashes per second) the Bitcoin network is performing.
They'd mine bitcoin a lot, get rewards, until it got hard, and bitcoin cash went down in difficulty. Then they'd mine bitcoin cash a lot, get rewards, until it got hard and bitcoin went down in difficulty.
@Daeng Even worse, some one was also timing it to happen in a way it hurt bitcoin transaction times.
They'd push the difficulty up, leave, then it would take a long time to get a block to confirm transactions
@Daeng if you look at bitcoin's history in terms of all the FUD and transaction time nonsense https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,all Johoe's Bitcoin Mempool Size Statistics
You can line up some of these events with huge problems occuring in mempool.
maybe diving a bit deep for the basics there
heh, while you’ve been through that, nethash jumped by a gigahash :P
sustained 3,6 starts to look likely soon
@Daeng ANYWAY, yeah, THAT is why the field size doesn't go back down. All the miners would have to do is turn off their machines for a week, and start mining again when it's easier.
Got it
difficulty: 40.403 (40.257) activated_field: 7 llama (63% to 41) So i need buy a 256gb RAM instead then?
Or nvme
I read somewhere in slack you said about network latency, I'm from a developing country will 5mbps internet be ok? I would like to mine from home
That is no problem at all
The pool mining protocol is rather efficient
@Daeng um, it's hard to advise on what to buy. it's a hard engineering problem.
@Daeng to be more clear, once you get mining going (have the field downloaded or generated) it should take about 100 bytes per second for the actual mining protocol. Probably less. Slack probably uses more.
No landline here and no unlimited bandwidth
Glad to know that
Ahh this is what i was talking about regarding the network speed for mining
@Daeng organizing documentation and stuff is going to be my next project after logging
third block in a week, my pool’s on a roll :P
I moved my massive fleet over to it
my fleet is about 1MH/s
you’ll double my hashrate, thank you, helps clear out the old shares from the 10M folks
I gotta retool for field 8
just do what @SidGrip is doing
Drugs?
:joy:
Does that ASUS nvme riser only work on certain motherboards?
Thinking of moving to nvme to stop chasing RAM dragon
It's always a risk chasing ram, but i just don't see getting to field 10 to quickly. So a 1tb ram miner maybe worth it
you could also shop a mean photo with 1tb of ram
ok, I orderd that ASUS card and 2x intel 760p 256gb
so combined with a little ram that gets me up to the 512gb field without trouble and I can add a few more of those nvmes if needed
if it works out, that intel 760p performance per price is hard to beat
I am hoping for around 110kh/s from that
which is of course not amazing