2018-11-06 20:06:24
Mining software concept: surf mode. Imagine you generate a ton of pending work units in memory. Each of them needs specific data from specific snow field segments.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:07:10
You read through the snowfield from block 0 till to end. Just one big sequential read. You use that data to advance the work units as you read the data they need.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:07:43
If you are lucky, then the next data they need is still coming and they are riding the wave, advancing along ahead of or with your read wave.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:08:00
If they need something behind the wave, then they are off the wave and either get abandoned or wait for the next wave.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:08:34
If your SSD can read at 3GB/s (fairly reasonable) then you can do a complete wave in 43 seconds.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:08:52
You can do 6 waves (the most you'll ever need for all work units to complete) in 256 seconds.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:09:00
This would be pushing it, but is below the block time.

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:09:36
and you can also try things like you only both with work units that make it to completion in 2 or 3 waves, discarding a huge number but still keeping a lot

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:11:34
is that just betting very wide on untangling the linked list onto a hilbert curve?

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:13:07
I don't know enough about hilbert curves to answer that. Those are the square space filling things, right?

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:13:30
yeah, ip address space wiggly snakes

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:14:50
i’ve been thinking of something similar, your random is too good, so just shuffling should always make seeks easier?

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:20:16
if your queue is deep enough, you can kinda simulate memory mining

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:20:29
don't even need the wave to be in order

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:20:41
just load the chunk with the longest current queue of work

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:21:39
i’ve been thinking of something like that for distributed mining across the internet

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:22:15
the bandwidth probably gets brutal

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:22:37
does it matter if some participants are slow?

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:22:59
glacial mining, melting the fields

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:23:56
not really

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:24:06
there are always more work units that could be started

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:24:15
if a particular queue is slow or dead, that is fine

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:24:44
exactly

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:25:05
so i guess people can participate if they have even one chunk

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:25:46
sure

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:26:51
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/2Wb8mq - current plan for a cheap 50kh/s miner (up to field 8)

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:28:40
missing a psu and a case

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:29:23
cases are for suckers

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:29:26
but yeah

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:29:49
mostly a combo deal could be cheap

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:29:52
With those things, probably at least $300, so $6/kh

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:30:01
which seems like a lot

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:30:23
prolly a bit less, but yeah

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:31:15
but those intel 760p seem pretty damn great for the price

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:31:20
how about you add a divider to your index for ’works up to n fields into the future’

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:31:21
assuming they can do what the specs say

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:31:49
they seem pretty legit and not thermally constrained either

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:32:18
intel is a boring enough company

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:32:30
right

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:32:55
My old intel 1.2TB PCIE nvme still kicks ass

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:34:01
450k/s random reads

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:34:46
that’s some 900 series workstation card?

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:36:17
I bought it in 2015

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:36:31
i remember people getting those for adobe scratch volumes

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:36:49
I got it for bitcoin/electrum servers

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:37:14
i ran mine on spinny disks, xfs and enough ram

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:39:25
@Clueless what was that m.2 pcie riser you liked?

Fireduck
2018-11-06 20:39:38
that’s the asus one

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:39:52
Link: http://a.co/d/adD2qMP

Clueless
2018-11-06 20:40:23
i’m morbidly curious as to how 760p would do on VROC on that

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:40:24
@Fireduck I'm totally ready to jump in mining, budget of 1-2 BTC

Clueless
2018-11-06 20:41:48
ctrl-f ’jump first’
http://telefinn.blogspot.com/2011/11/matti-nykanen-quotes.html In in recent weeks, I have made references on a couple of occasions to the legendary Finnish ski-jumper and bon-viveur Matti Nykänen . In pa...

Rotonen
2018-11-06 20:43:25
"If things are going well, then call me. I can fuck it up In seven seconds."

Fireduck
2018-11-06 22:51:20
one can now get epyc on amazon

Rotonen
2018-11-06 23:07:47
Me too thinking of mining but maybe I'm too late at 128gb ram i don't have any machines/facility have to start from zero though if i mine it'll help the network get more decentralized as i think maybe nobody from where I'm at mine this yet

Daeng
2018-11-06 23:14:17
128GB gets you quite far at this point still

Rotonen
2018-11-06 23:21:11
@Fireduck there's your upcoming unicorn tears again, 4TB per socket EPYCs sometime in 2019
https://www.anandtech.com/print/13561/amd-previews-epyc-rome-processor-up-to-64-zen-2-cores AMD Previews EPYC ‘Rome’ Processor: Up to 64 Zen 2 Cores

Rotonen