For being involved in crypto and some of you since the early days, it's odd you don't know about masternodes and telegram lol. Just an observation
I am a turtle
Has your only focus been on Bitcoin and not on altcoins?
That would make sense. Masternodes aren't a huge innovation and are only seen in certain forks.
But this is a whole other level of btc maximalism lol
Very little attention to altcoi s from me
"I am a turtle" said the duck...
I use telegram to talk to my one friend with a windows phone
@quantumblockz my focus has been entirely bitcoin
Yeah, I dragged him into this mess
i quite like snowblossom not promising much
It is the millennium falcon of crypto. Doesn't look like much but has got it where it counts.
That tiny glow thing is the sun
Air quality index 209
Its supposed to get better tomorrow!
I'm already in tomorrow !
well... is it better ?
nope
damn it
lol
Wow, this is cool
I prefer green.
the chunked version of field 9 torrent is up if anyone is into that sort of thing
@Fireduck Sorry, I'm still lost with my problem from yesterday You mention to use "key_count=1 key_pool_size=0" But where should I use those arguments ? When I generate the wallet ? (client.bat key_count=1 key_pool_size=0) Or do I have to insert those parameters within a config file ?
those go in the config file
that basically tells the client to not create any extra keys when making the wallet
copy the config file, change the wallet_path in the new config file
and add those two lines
copy client.bat as well if you are using that
and point it at the new config file
then when you run that it will make a new wallet
which will have a much smaller export file
However, I've opened a feature request for what you really want: https://github.com/snowblossomcoin/snowblossom/issues/118 Allow user to export the keys for a single address and the associated private keys for that address.
Are there advantages of using field 9 right now?
@mjay nope
just being ready
@Fireduck: Great, it works. Thank you so much for your help & assistance, you were really helpful :grin: Now I only get one instance when I export private key !
Thank u so much @Fireduck :grinning:
I'm so happy it's working !
glad to hear it
@Fireduck I dunno if it's been suggested/lost before, but it might be an idea to make the miners into torrent seeders (optionally) to help seed things.
it has been suggested
not sure if it is a good idea
people run miners in cloud, cloud outbound data is expensive (sometimes as much as $0.10/GB
Don't want to shock and awe people in that way
agreed. in that case it'd have to default to being turned off.
hell, you could make people pay for downloads ha
create incentive for miners to host higher fields ahead of time
I have field 12 generated. :wink:
it is a bear, taking days to sync even on local network
do you need someone else to generate them? We could check the roots
I've generated all of them on multiple machines to make sure
Can't add 12 without a protocol change anyways
since the root wasn't shipped with 1.0
but it took like 20 days to generate so I just like to be ready
12 is 4TB?
yeah
I guess we are ready for quite some time
also, each field is a 4x hash power increase required to activate it
so to get to those fields we would need bitcoin level of mining interest, probably
to activate 12 thats almost 1TH/s .. if I did the math correctly
probably more instances than aws has to offer
11 activates at difficulty 47, ; 2^47/1e12 140.737488355328
so 140 TH/s to reach field 11
dont we have to divide by 600 seconds?
oh yeah
I was wondering why my math was so off
yeah, 234 GH/s to reach field 11
thats a lot :wink:
with this monser PoW, yeah
just started generating field 13, because I can :wink:
oh god
If you don't have SSD that large, it will take like a year
that’ll still be in time, most likely
ha. I don't even have that much HDD storage spare.
My home infrastructure is in a state of flux (aka, a strange mess of strange hardware)