pool failover coming up
woo, can you have two pools work together with failover?
or, http://example.fun with multiple ips
what if HA will be on the front of 2+ pools in a failover mode? [pool dns name pointed to HA ip] [HA] [pool1] [pool2] [pool-n]
Bad idea with current setup. Grpc may reconnect randomly and the new connection might be to a system that hasn't heard of your work unit and rejects shares.
Is the client compatible with mac?
yes
INFO: Generating snow field at 4244.73 writes per second. Estimated total runtime is 491.86 hours. 0.03 complete.
field 12 is a bear
@Fireduck failover mode will switch to the next node only in case if the active one has died
@some that is the plan
more specifically, my plan was to have the miner maintain work units from all configured pools in memory
and use the first pool from the list that has a current valid work unit
that way the failover is very fast and we can report on pool being up or not even when we aren't using it
I’ve meant HA in failover mode on the front of a bunch on nodes
But from miner side looks more reliable
ah, in the case of doing it on the server side, yeah, that would work
there would be some rejects when it fails over but should be fine
The kicker for me is I can switch a data center ip to another internal box, but if the work doesn't carry over it may confuse miners on the pool.
Have to update /restart services once a week.
yeah, it is way better for client side smarts to do this smoothly