2019-01-04 08:27:05
we went under one giga nethash after all, still adjusting, it seems
Rotonen
2019-01-04 13:18:31
The difficulty still corresponds to 1.75GH/s, it needs more time to fully adjust
mjay
2019-01-04 17:07:58
the slow adjust is sorta nice as it gives ample time to react
Rotonen
2019-01-04 17:08:30
people trying to make transactions will disagree
Rotonen
2019-01-04 17:09:38
The situation is not that bad, we are at >3 blocks per hour
mjay
2019-01-04 17:17:21
the largest gap was 3h?
Rotonen
2019-01-04 17:23:59
I think so
mjay
2019-01-04 17:25:03
2h 27min
mjay
2019-01-04 17:26:10
34638 to 34639
mjay
2019-01-04 17:34:15
and if the minerbase grows to trigger a field change, more and more of them will prep up in time
Rotonen
2019-01-04 17:38:07
I doubt it will happen any time soon
mjay
2019-01-04 17:44:29
yeah, gives ample time to widen the nethash distribution
Rotonen
2019-01-04 17:44:48
let’s see how that looks like in february
Rotonen
2019-01-04 17:50:12
Fun times
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:13:16
@Fireduck just mine on jet, as far as i can tell the rest of your fleet does not actually contribute
Rotonen
2019-01-04 18:14:45
The rest of the fleet does all the cpu work
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:14:52
the cpu on jet is really slow somehow
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:20:47
sounds weird
Rotonen
2019-01-04 18:21:36
I know
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:21:45
I can't explain it
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:22:03
I would get only about 300hk/s from jet using ram and cpu as hard as I could
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:22:17
@Fireduck I don't understand why there's so much overhead.
Clueless
2019-01-04 18:22:18
but get about 1mh/s if I use it to support the rest of the fleet
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:22:48
@Clueless nor do I. I suspect it is something about being a 4-socket machine and maybe everything is lost in cross socket syncrhonization.
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:22:54
CPU processing hashes is slower than just providing IO to the rest of the fleet, no?
Clueless
2019-01-04 18:23:04
yep
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:23:13
It can sling over network faster than it can hash locally
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:23:16
I don't find that part confusing.
Clueless
2019-01-04 18:37:00
nethash: 871.708 Mh/s
what diff are we heading to with 870 mh/s?
fydel
2019-01-04 18:38:49
are you asking me to math?
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:39:47
38.92525885055614561430
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:40:37
; 870*1000000*600
522000000000
log(522000000000)/log(2)
~38.92525885055614561
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:40:50
The great thing about the log2 based difficulty is that the math is all very simple
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:41:15
yeah, thanks for the formula. i will write this down.
fydel
2019-01-04 18:42:57
I should put it into the explorer of 'if we maintain this hash rate, this will be the difficulty'
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:43:03
maybe with better words
Fireduck
2019-01-04 18:43:19
that is a very good idea.
fydel
2019-01-04 20:06:00
no, that is snake eat tail
Rotonen