heh, pc hardware is currently bad enough for amazon to be impacted by it https://www.anandtech.com/print/13657/amazon-launches-pc-hardware-compatibility-checker Amazon Launches Online Tool to Check Compatibility of PC Hardware
i wonder if whole drive encryption affects mining, or if it only would once the processor is maxed out. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2762844/how-does-bitlocker-affect-performance @Fable I'm an http://ASP.NET / C# developer. I use VS2010 all the time. I am thinking of enabling BitLocker on my laptop to protect the contents, but I am concerned about performance degradation. Developers who ...
@cryptovape it absolutely effects mining for snowblossom, if it's using the drive at all.
• encrypted data has overhead, takes longer to fetch • encrypted data might be distributed differently in storage, takes longer to fetch • encrypted data has to be decrypted • data has to be encrypted to be written again etc.
so if you're mining on an encrypted drive, bad.
good info thanks. Probably why I was only getting 17 kH/s on my 2014 nvme. maybe Fable is also affected.
I'm not sure about that.
I think file system encryption uses a scheme where the key for a particular block is derived based on the offset of the block so the same number reads the same size of reads should be required.
So minus the CPU cost I think you should have the same performance on an encrypted file system.
Like this, let X be the master key for the drive
the key for block N is hash(X,N)
and the IV can be hash(master_IV,N)
easy as eating pancakes
there are probably some layers of indirection to allow to change the master dirve key/password
but same idea
:+1:
I still expect it to add overhead and will assume that until proven otherwise. :P
@Clueless processors actually implement square millimetres worth of stuff to make that as transparent as possible
@Rotonen every time I've benchmarked NVME (in general), I could swear I've seen diminished speeds.
I could be wrong though
throughput, yes, seek latencies. results vary