@Clueless I kind of doubt your PR to SLIP-0044 will get accepted, I don't think they appreciate testnet index claims and expect you to just use `1`.
Same for channels: `Coin types will be added only if there is a wallet implementing BIP-0044 for desired coin.`
@Fireduck there was an interesting talk about quantum proof signature algorithms at the 35c3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCmnQR3_qWg YouTube Video: 35C3 - The year in post-quantum crypto
Are you willing to add signatures based on one of the most promising candidates like HQC(http://pqc-hqc.org/) or CSIDH as a SIP?
Are they in the PQE process?
Yeah they are
I am watching that process
My plan was to look closely at things that got into round two
Most of them dont have a java implementation yet, it might involve some effort
Maxium effort!
Yeah and I'm not sure how quickly the bouncy castle guys will be on implementing it in Java
I used bouncy castle for all the other things so I prefer to continue to use them and they'll probably do it it's just a question of timing
seed based wallets are going well
Anyone want to be brave? :wink:
lollll, with testnet, sure
I need to add unit tests
and the import mechanism is kinda silly
since it will always generate a new seed on new wallet load
and then you import your old one
and now you have two seeds