[snowblossomcoin/snowblossom] Issue opened by fireduck64
[snowblossomcoin/snowblossom] Issue closed by fireduck64
[snowblossomcoin/snowblossom] Issue closed by fireduck64
@Fireduck heh, someone summarized your quantum tough article as ’rsa is optional’ with the speartip of ’that does not address anything’ - the title leads and frames people too much
@Fireduck good morning. i think there might be a bug in the latest mrplow. the pool is not adjusting the difficulty anymore.
@fydel maybe it's found its sweet spot
i don't think so. big miners are hammering with shares. this cant be intended.
@fydel ah, snap
I have a bug in recent change
one sec
update now
I'll have to do some more work later to make that feature actually work, but it is fine without it
thanks, mate.
heh, the main data centre i use just made data unmetered
i guess i’ll seed field 8
seems you had a ’dumb hammer SMASH’ moment, might want to think the integration testing through there?
Heh, yeah
@Fireduck I still need to go over logging in general, but the logging.properties file has been added to the deployment `bulid.sh` script.
ok
takes care of the logging file error people see