@Fireduck is there a downtimeless way to do ACID backups of the pool db?
Not currently
Writes are infrequent so rsync should be fine
I know that isn't exactly what you are looking for
@Rotonen they should just average all the existing times together and use that as a universal time
• Fix for ByteBuffer madness • Bunch of rpc work in client and client improvements for tx building • android build process changes
@Rotonen You mentioned trademarks, code ownership, and "neat legal form" might make this project seem cleaner to you, I'm interested what you mean exactly. Do we have uncovered bases? :P
many
he's on about 'not making me a dev' or some other such confusing topic - i'm mostly here to provide technical user feedback and enjoying the technicalities PoW challenge
but i did point out to him i only contribute to open source projects which are organized in a way they hold all the trademarks and code ownership in a neat legal form, and contributors sign contributor agreements
well, It's just a respect/role/permission thing in discord, I don't intend for us to be centralized.
but yeah, you bring up some points I'm not familiar with.
as originally stated, you onesidedly flagged me a moderator in discord and i told you may do so so long as you never expect me to moderate
Yeah, I'm in no position to have any expectations/requirements of you. You just seem sane.
and yes, i am available for dev work, for hourly rates in fiat, for legally organized parties, if need be
also for yeast microbiology consultancy in beer brewing contexts, but that's probably even less relevant for you
We have big plans. That could play a part.
No fucking IPAs.
I hate IPA
i have a sour beer brewery
@Fireduck same! lager?
Pilsner, lager, stout all fine
but, on topic, as technical user feedback, how does the pplns 5 block scheme on my pool still show shares for more than one miner when there has been only one miner for the past 5 blocks? did i get it wrong?
It isn't 5 blocks found by your pool, it is 5 blocks of shares. It would be 5 pool blocks if your luck was exactly as statisticaly expected.
how's it forming that '5 block' sliding window?
i mean it's sorta what i expected, but it's brutal to new minings starting up on a dead pool with existing shares from previous higher difficulties
it's within ~90% of what i expected, though
so almost just off by one from my point of view
It simply tracks pow(2,diff-18)*5 shares back
If the base difficulty is 18. Not sure I remember right.
So yeah, if diff goes up, the buffer gets bigger
I think the reasoning is to prevent pool hopping, and forcing them to meet thresholds of shares before payout
eh, could just run PPS to keep it simple and differentiate, but would have to do a private fork
but cool, seems i just had bad research on my side for how pplns works
but re: organised open source - suppose @Fireduck dies and the inheritors go full blown stupid with trying to sell the rights to the code to horrible vested parties, which are a part of the estate then
etc. legal mess, for which quite a lot of things are organised to have a single legal body holding all the rights
that would be fun